WATER COOLING TOWER ENSOTEK

WATER COOLING TOWER ENSOTEK, Heating & Cooling Systems
WATER COOLING TOWER ENSOTEK, Heating & Cooling Systems

Warning: It is recommended that you do not make any payment (deposit, advance, etc.) before visiting the actual area (workplace, shop, etc.) where the advertiser offers his goods and services to the relevant parties and before receiving the goods and services you want to buy.

Ensotek Water Cooling Tower 1. Since it is made of FRP material, there is no need for painting. 2. Resistant to chemicals and corrosion. In a few years, the hair seen below does not rust and fall out like a tower. .. 3. As a filler; 3.1. Of water; Curler made of PP (Polypropylene) material is used in businesses where it is dirty, oily, scaled, prone to calcification and the environment is very dusty. PP material can be used successfully even in process waters up to 100°C. The risk of clogging is low, it is possible and easy to clean for reuse. 3.2. PVC honeycomb filler is used in facilities where the water is clean (free from oil, sediment, lime and dirt) and the operating environment is free from dust and dirt. Due to its wet surface, its cooling performance is quite good compared to other filling types. 4. The materials used are compatible with each other. There is no metal or wood material in the FRP structure, durability is provided by imported Coremat material of 3mm thickness. For this reason, it is possible to serve 30-40 years. 5. Maintenance costs are very low compared to sheet towers. 6. In towers that suck the air from the top, the energy consumed by the fan is lower than in the towers that push the air from below. Since the exit velocity of the humid air expelled from the tower is high, it moves away from the tower. It is unlikely to be reabsorbed by the fan. On the other hand, in bottom push towers, since the exit velocity of the humid air expelled from the tower is very low and its density is high, it cannot be removed from the tower surroundings much. This causes moist air to be sucked back into the tower by the fan. For this reason, towers that suck the air from the top provide approximately 1.5 - 2 times energy savings compared to towers that are pushed from the bottom. 7. Since the cooling performance and approach to the wet bulb temperature (cooling close to the ambient air) are good, it increases the efficiency of the enterprises, does not cause product loss, and enables the systems to save energy. 8. Our tower, which provides savings in maintenance and operating costs in a very short time, although the initial investment costs are relatively high (the raw material is expensive compared to sheet steel); It is the most economical for users. 9. Spare parts supply is very easy and cheap. Please message for price information.